THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH
CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Jason Barnhill, Appellant.
Appeal From Williamsburg
County
Clifton Newman, Circuit Court
Judge
Unpublished Opinion
No. 2004-UP-311
Submitted February 20, 2004
– Filed May 7, 2004
APPEAL DISMISSED
Assistant Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Cecil Kelley Jackson, of Sumter, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Jason Barnhill pled guilty to robbery and was sentenced to seven years imprisonment. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Barnhill’s counsel attached a petition to be relieved as counsel. Barnhill did not file a pro se response.
After review of the record pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Barnhill’s appeal and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED. [1]
GOOLSBY, HOWARD,
and KITTREDGE, JJ., concurring.
[1] Because oral argument would not aid the Court in resolving any issue on appeal, we decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215 and 220(b)(2), SCACR.