Benjamin C. Bruner, of Bruner Powell Wall & Mullins, LLC, of Columbia, for Appellant. Julio E. Mendoza, Jr., of Nexsen Pruet, LLC, of Columbia, for Respondent.

This appeal involves Team IA's supplemental proceedings to collect on a 2015 judgment it obtained against Cicero Lucas after a jury found Lucas breached an employment agreement (the Agreement) with Team IA. Team IA argues the master-in-equity erred in finding it was not entitled to post-judgment attorney's fees in connection with the supplemental proceedings. Specifically, Team IA argues the master erred because: (1) the Agreement and the circuit court's order entering the 2015 judgment allowed for attorney's fees; (2) the Agreement's fee-shifting provision was not ambiguous; (3) the master did not consider evidence of the parties' intent, (4) the merger doctrine did not extinguish Team IA's right to attorney's fees upon the entry of the 2015 judgment; and (5) the master's findings were against the law of the case.

Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, of Columbia, and Jordan Christopher Calloway, of McGowan Hood & Felder, LLC, of Rock Hill, for Appellant. Senior Assistant Attorney General W. Edgar Salter, III, of Columbia, for Respondent.

Angelita Wright appeals her murder conviction, arguing the circuit court erred in qualifying Sergeant Letterman as an expert in cell phone mapping and allowing him to testify outside the scope of permissible rebuttal testimony.

Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant. Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., of Columbia, for Respondent.

John Ernest Perry Jr. appeals his conviction of attempted murder. He maintains because he told the police his gun "went off" accidentally as he attempted to dispose of the gun during a police chase, the trial court erred in charging the jury "when the intent to do an act that violates the law exists, motive becomes immaterial," because attempted murder was a specific intent crime and this was essentially a general intent instruction.

Joanna Katherine Delany, of Columbia, for Appellant. Joshua Abraham Edwards, of Columbia, for Respondent.

Desa Ballard and Harvey M. Watson, III, both of Ballard & Watson, Attorneys at Law, of West Columbia, for Appellant. Damon Christian Wlodarczyk, of Riley Pope & Laney, LLC, of Columbia, for Respondent South Carolina Department of Corrections. Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Megan Harrigan Jameson, of Columbia, for Respondent The State.

Charles Carpenter appeals the circuit court's denials of his Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Declaratory Judgment. Carpenter asserts the trial court erred in finding: (1) Carpenter's petition for a writ of habeas corpus was not proper for the circuit court; (2) Carpenter's current claims against the State should have been raised in a petition for post-conviction relief; (3) Carpenter's sentencing judge had proper jurisdiction to sentence Carpenter to two consecutive twenty-five year terms of imprisonment; and (4) the State Department of Corrections (SCDC) did not violate Carpenter's due process rights. Carpenter also asserts the circuit court erred in failing to rule on Carpenter's declaratory judgment claims and, finally, Carpenter argues the circuit court was biased in favor of Respondents.

George Trenholm Walker and John Phillips Linton, Jr., both of Walker Gressette Freeman & Linton, LLC, of Charleston, for Appellants. C. Mitchell Brown, Allen Mattison Bogan, and Nicholas Andrew Charles, all of Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP, of Columbia, for Respondent. Mary Bass Lohr and Robert W. Achurch, III, both of Howell Gibson & Hughes, PA, of Beaufort, for Respondent. Caroline Dolores Gimenez, of Anderson, for Respondent.

In this breach of contract action, Road, LLC and Pinckney Point, LLC appeal the trial court's order granting Beaufort County's motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. Road, LLC argues the trial court erred by finding that (1) there was no evidence to support the jury's finding of breach of contract, (2) the $5 million in damages were speculative, and (3) the contract was a nullity.

Charles S. Altman, of The Law Offices of Charles S. Altman, of Charleston, for Appellant. Patrick John Norton, of Chicago, Illinois, for Appellant. Meredith L. Coker, of Charleston, for Appellant. Stephanie Holmes Burton, of Gibbes Burton, LLC, of Spartanburg, for Respondent.

In this professional negligence action, Fine Housing, Inc., appeals the circuit court's order granting William Sloan Jr.'s motion to disqualify Fine Housing, Inc.'s counsel, Charles Altman, as a necessary witness.

David Alexander, of Columbia, for Appellant. Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Deborah R.J. Shupe, of Columbia, for Respondent.

Micah Bilton appeals the finding that he is a sexually violent predator and argues the trial court erred in allowing a psychologist to testify about the results of a diagnostic test that allegedly measured Bilton's arousal to deviant images and audio. He argues the psychologist did not administer the test, review the raw data, that the test results were not peer-reviewed, and that this evidence's admission violates the Confrontation Clause and due process.

Alexandre Nicolas MacClenahan, of The MacClenahan Law Firm, LLC, of Greenville, for Appellants. Desa Ballard and Harvey M. Watson, III, both of Ballard & Watson, Attorneys at Law, of West Columbia, for Respondent.

Stephen Bretzinger and Lindsey Holsinger appeal the circuit court's failure to set aside the entry of default and default judgment awarded to Neil Truslow in his action against them for breach of contract.

Charles L. Henshaw, Jr., of Furr & Henshaw, of Columbia, for Appellants. C. Mitchell Brown and Brian Patrick Crotty, both of Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP, of Columbia, for Respondents. Dennis Gary Lovell, Jr., of Copeland, Stair, Kingma & Lovell, LLP, of Charleston, for Respondents. Caroline Dolores Gimenez, of Anderson, for Respondents.

Treva C. Flowers, Tristan Flowers, and Ashley F. (Appellants) sued Dr. Bang N. Giep and Spartanburg & Pelham OB-GYN (Respondents) for injuries suffered by Child during birth. Appellants assert the circuit court erred in denying its motion to strike Respondents' affirmative defense of emergency medical care.