THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Manning Peterson, Appellant.
Appeal From Lee County
Howard P. King, Circuit Court Judge
Opinion No. 2003-UP-140
Submitted January 10, 2003 - Filed February
19, 2003��
APPEAL DISMISSED
Chief Attorney Daniel T. Stacey, of Columbia for Appellant.
Deputy Director for Legal Services Teresa A. Knox,� Legal Counsel Tommy Evans, Jr., Legal Counsel J. Benajmin Aplin, of Columbia; for Respondent.
PER CURIAM:� Manning Peterson appeals from his probation revocation, arguing the trial court erred in revoking his probation in full.� Peterson�s counsel attached to the brief a petition to be relieved as counsel, stating he had reviewed the record and concluded Peterson�s appeal lacks merit.� Peterson filed a separate pro se brief.� After a thorough review of the record, counsel�s brief, and Peterson�s brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss [1] Peterson�s appeal and grant counsel�s motion to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
HEARN, C.J., GOOLSBY and SHULER, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.�