THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Arthur James Buie, Appellant.
Appeal From Sumter County
Clifton Newman, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2003-UP-314�
Submitted February 20, 2003 � Filed May 6, 2003
APPEAL DISMISSED
Chief Attorney Daniel T. Stacey, of Columbia, for Appellant
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson, Senior Assistant Attorney General Harold M. Coombs, Jr., all of Columbia;� and Solicitor Cecil Kelley Jackson, of Sumter; for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Arthur James Buie was convicted of armed robbery and possession of a weapon during a violent crime for which he was sentenced to twelve years imprisonment.� Buie contends the trial court lacked jurisdiction because the indictment for armed robbery failed to allege the element of intent of permanent deprivation.� After a thorough review of the record and counsel�s brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss [1] Buie�s appeal and grant counsel�s motion to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
HEARN, C.J., CURETON and GOOLSBY, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.�