THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.� IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.�
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Garland W. Harris, Appellant.
Appeal From York County
�John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge
Opinion No.�� 2004-UP-469
Submitted September 15, 2004 � Filed September 16, 2004
APPEAL DISMISSED
Assistant Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, Office of Appellate Defense, of Columbia; Garland W. Harris #252650, Manning Correctional, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Legal Counsel Tommy Evans, Jr.; Legal Counsel J. Benjamin Aplin; and Deputy Director for Legal Services Teresa A. Knox, S.C. Dept. of Probation, Parole, and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM:� Garland W. Harris appeals the revocation of his probationary sentence.� In 1998, Harris was convicted of seven counts of burglary, four counts of grand larceny, and four counts of petit larceny.� He was sentenced to a total of fifteen years imprisonment, suspended upon the service of seven years and five years probation, and ordered to pay restitution.� On February 3, 2003, Harris�s probation was revoked due to numerous violations.�
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), counsel for Harris attached to the final brief a petition to be relieved as counsel, stating she had reviewed the record and concluded Harris�s appeal is without legal merit sufficient to warrant a new trial.� Harris did not file a pro se response.�
After a thorough review of the record pursuant to Anders and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel�s petition to be relieved.�
APPEAL DISMISSED. [1]
STILWELL, BEATTY, and SHORT, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.