THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.� IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina Department of Social Services, Respondent,

�� v.

Tina H., Robert H., Anthony R., and Daniel R.  Defendants,

Of Whom Tina H. and Anthony R. are the Appellants.

In the interest of three minor children under the age of 18.

Appeal From Greenville County
Timothy L. Brown, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-400
Submitted July 1, 2009 � Filed August 5, 2009��

AFFIRMED

W. Wallace Culp, III, and Charles B. Bowen, Jr., of Greenville, for Appellants.

Deborah Murdock, of Mauldin, for Respondent.

Robert Clark, of Greenville, for Guardian Ad Litem.�

PER CURIAM: Tina H. and Anthony R. appeal from the family court's order removing three minor children from their custody.� S.C. Code Ann. � 63-7-1660 (Supp. 2008).� Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of fact and conclusions of law, pursuant to Ex Parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing.� Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling.

AFFIRMED.[1]

HEARN, C.J., CURETON, A.J., and GOOLSBY, A.J., concur.�

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.