THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.� IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Rahmelle Jamaal Dingle, Appellant.

Appeal From York County
R. Knox McMahon, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-458
Submitted October 1, 2009 � Filed October 8, 2009���

APPEAL DISMISSED

Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of Columbia, for Appellant.

J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:� Rahmelle Jamaal Dingle appeals the revocation of his probation.� Dingle argues the evidence presented at the probation revocation hearing was insufficient for the circuit court to revoke his probation.� After a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Dingle's appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J., KONDUROS and LOCKEMY, JJ, concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.