THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.� IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina Department of Social Services, Respondent,

�� v.

Ruth P., Corey P., and John Doe, Defendants,

Of whom Ruth P. is the Appellant.

In the interest of two minor children under the age of 18.

In the interest of two minor children under the age of 18.

Appeal From Berkeley County
Jack A. Landis, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-051
Submitted February 1, 2011 � Filed February 4, 2011���

AFFIRMED

J. Jay Hulst, of Moncks Corner, for Appellant.

Wolfgang Louis Kelly, of Moncks Corner, for Respondent.

Sean F. Keefer and Revonda Hardesty, both of Moncks Corner, for Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Ruth P. appeals from the family court's final order terminating her parental rights to her minor children.� S.C. Code Ann. � 63-7-2570 (2010).� Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex Parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing.� Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling.

AFFIRMED.[1]

WILLIAMS and KONDUROS, JJ., and CURETON, A.J., concur.� ��� ��

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.