THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Manning Peterson, Appellant.
Appeal From Lee County
Howard P. King, Circuit Court Judge
Opinion No. 2003-UP-140
Submitted January 10, 2003 - Filed February
19, 2003
APPEAL DISMISSED
Chief Attorney Daniel T. Stacey, of Columbia for Appellant.
Deputy Director for Legal Services Teresa A. Knox, Legal Counsel Tommy Evans, Jr., Legal Counsel J. Benajmin Aplin, of Columbia; for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Manning Peterson appeals from his probation revocation, arguing the trial court erred in revoking his probation in full. Peterson’s counsel attached to the brief a petition to be relieved as counsel, stating he had reviewed the record and concluded Peterson’s appeal lacks merit. Peterson filed a separate pro se brief. After a thorough review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Peterson’s brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss [1] Peterson’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
HEARN, C.J., GOOLSBY and SHULER, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.