THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State,        Respondent,

v.

Riley James,        Appellant.


Appeal From Orangeburg County
Luke N. Brown, Jr., Circuit Court Judge


Unpublished Opinion No. 2003-UP-212
Submitted January 29, 2003 - Filed March 19, 2003††


APPEAL DISMISSED


Assistant Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia; for Appellant

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster; Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh; Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson, all of Columbia; Solicitor Walter M. Bailey, Jr., of Summerville; for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:† Riley James appeals his conviction for second-degree burglary, arguing that the trial court erred in ruling that defense counsel did not use racially neutral reasons in striking three jurors.† In a separately filed pro se brief, James also argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a directed verdict, that police officers did not have probable cause to arrest him for burglary second, and that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress blown-up photographs of the crime scene. After a thorough review of the record and counselís brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss [1] Jamesís appeal and grant counselís motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J., GOOLSBY and SHULER, JJ., concur.


[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.†