THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State,        Respondent,

v.

Lisa Christian Braswell,        Appellant.

Appeal From Abbeville County
Joseph J. Watson , Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2003-UP-256
Heard December 10, 2002 – Filed April 8, 2003

AFFIRMED

Sally G. Calhoun, of Beaufort, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson, Assistant Attorney General W. Rutledge Martin, of Columbia;  and Solicitor William Townes Jones, of Greenwood; for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Lisa Christian Braswell was convicted of felony driving under the influence and was sentenced to twelve years imprisonment and a $10,000 fine.  Braswell appeals.

We affirm pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authorities:  Issue 1:  State v. Burdette, 335 S.C. 34, 46, 515 S.E.2d 525, 531 (1999) (holding that on appeal from the denial of a directed verdict, an appellate court must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the State); State v. Pinckney, 339 S.C. 346, 349, 529 S.E.2d 526, 527 (2000) (holding that if there is any direct evidence or substantial circumstantial evidence reasonably tending to prove the guilt of the accused, we must find the case was properly submitted to the jury); Issue 2:  State v. Osborne, 335 S.C. 172, 175, 516 S.E.2d 201, 202 (1999) (“[i]t is well-settled law that a conviction cannot be had on the extra-judicial confessions of a defendant unless they are corroborated by proof aliunde of the corpus delicti”); Id. at 180, 516 S.E.2d at 205 (“the corroboration rule is satisfied if the State provides sufficient independent evidence which serves to corroborate the defendant’s extra-judicial statements and, together with such statements, permits a reasonable belief that the crime occurred”); Issues 3 and 5:  State v. Benton, 338 S.C. 151, 157, 526 S.E.2d 228, 231 (2000) (finding an issue is not preserved if party argues one ground for objection at trial and a different ground on appeal); and Issue 4 :  State v. Nichols, 325 S.C. 111, 120-21, 481 S.E.2d 118, 123 (1997) (holding that an issue may not be raised for first time on appeal, but must have been raised to trial judge to be preserved for appellate review).

AFFIRMED.

GOOLSBY, HUFF, and SHULER, JJ., concur.