THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.† IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
Charles E. Garza, Appellant.
Appeal From Greenville County
†Diane Schafer Goodstein, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No.† 2008-UP-158
Submitted March 3, 2008 Ė Filed March 12, 2008
Appellate Defender LaNelle C. DuRant, South Carolina Commission of Indigent Defense, Division of Appellate Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.
John Benjamin Aplin, South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole, and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Charles Garza appeals his probation revocation, arguing the amount of revocation is unconstitutionally disproportionate and constitutes cruel and unusual punishment.† After a thorough review of the record and counselís brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Garzaís appeal and grant counselís motion to be relieved.
ANDERSON, SHORT, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.
 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.