THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Shawn L. Haynes a/k/a Vashaun L. Haynes, Appellant.

Appeal From Charleston County
 Daniel  F.  Pieper, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-564
Submitted October 1, 2008 – Filed October 13, 2008   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief Attorney Joseph L. Savitz, III, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, of Columbia; and Solicitor Scarlett A. Wilson, of Charleston, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Shawn Haynes appeals his convictions and sentences for carjacking, armed robbery, grand larceny, and possession of a firearm during the commission of a violent crime.  On appeal, Haynes argues the trial court erred by allowing the State to introduce reply testimony to impeach his testimony on a collateral matter in violation of State v. Brock, 130 S.C. 252, 126 S.E.2d 28 (1925).  After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Haynes’ appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

ANDERSON, WILLIAMS, and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.