THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina Department of Social Services, Respondent,

   v.

Matina N. and Carnell N., Appellants,

In the interest of three minor children under the age of 18.

Appeal From Aiken County
Peter R. Nuessle, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-135
Submitted April 1, 2011 – Filed April 5, 2011   

AFFIRMED

A. Christy Tyner, of Aiken, for Appellant Matina N.

Mark L. Wilhelmi, of Augusta, Georgia, for Appellant Carnell N.

Dennis Gmerek, of Aiken, for Respondent.

Patrick McWilliams, of Aiken, Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Matina N. and Carnell N. both appeal from the family court's final order terminating their parental rights to their minor children.  See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570 (2010).  Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex Parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing.  Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling.

AFFIRMED.[1]

WILLIAMS and KONDUROS, JJ., and CURETON, A.J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.