THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Supreme Court

Alonzo White, Petitioner,

v.

State of South Carolina, Respondent.


††††††††† ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI


Appeal From Sumter County
John C. Hayes, Trial Judge
George C. James, Jr., Post-Conviction Relief Judge


Memorandum Opinion No.††† 2010-MO-021
Submitted August 18, 2010 Ė Filed August 23, 2010†


DISMISSED


Appellate Defender Lanelle Cantey Durant, of South Carolina Commission on Indigent Defense, Division of Appellate Defense, of Columbia, for Petitioner.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, and Assistant Attorney General Mary S. Williams, all of Columbia, for Respondent.


PER CURIAM:† Petitioner seeks a writ of certiorari from the denial of his application for post-conviction relief (PCR).

The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied as to petitionerís Question 2.† Because there is sufficient evidence to support the PCR judgeís finding that petitioner did not knowingly and intelligently waive his right to a direct appeal, we grant the petition for a writ of certiorari on petitionerís Question 1, dispense with further briefing, and proceed with a review of the direct appeal issues pursuant to Davis v. State, 288 S.C. 290, 342 S.E.2d 60 (1986).

We dismiss petitionerís direct appeal under Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, after consideration of appellantís pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).† Counselís motion to be relieved is granted.

DISMISSED.

TOAL, C.J., PLEICONES, BEATTY, KITTREDGE and HEARN, JJ., concur.