Kathleen C. Barnes, of Barnes Law Firm, LLC, of Hampton and Brian L. Boger, of Columbia, for Petitioners. Stephanie C. Trotter, of McCabe, Trotter & Beverly, PC, of Columbia and Eric C. Hale and Elias Fain, both of Clarkson Law Firm, of Columbia, for Respondents.

The Court granted a writ of certiorari to review the court of appeals' decision in Winrose Homeowners' Ass'n v. Hale, 423 S.C. 220, 813 S.E.2d 894 (Ct. App. 2018).

Robert David Proffitt and Ronald Brian Cox, both of Proffitt & Cox, LLP, of Columbia, for Petitioners. Andrew F. Lindemann of Lindemann, Davis & Hughes, PA, of Columbia; and Murrell Smith, Jr., and David Cornwell Holler, both of Lee, Erter, Wilson, Holler & Smith, LLC, of Sumter; and Stanley Lamont Myers, Sr., of Moore Taylor Law Firm, PA, of West Columbia, all for Respondent.

We review whether the court of appeals erred in affirming three of the trial court's decisions: 1) in entering a judgment in favor of the defense on a spouse's loss of consortium claim when the directly injured spouse did not recover because the jury found him more at fault, 2) denying a motion for a new trial based on alleged jury concealment during voir dire, and 3) denying a motion for a new trial when a juror purportedly engaged in premature deliberations.

Robert B. Varnado, of Brown & Varnado, LLC, of Mount Pleasant, for Petitioner. Michael Warner Battle, of Battle Law Firm, LLC, of Conway, for Respondent.

The Court granted certiorari to review the court of appeals' decision in Skydive Myrtle Beach, Inc. v. Horry County, 424 S.C. 298, 818 S.E.2d 224 (Ct. App. 2018).

General Counsel Jason P. Luther, Counsel for Litigation Dana R. Krajack and Counsel for Litigation Sean G. Ryan, all of Columbia, for Appellant. Robert N. Hill, of Lexington, Mark B. Tinsley, of Gooding & Gooding, PA, of Allendale, Daniel W. Williams of Bedingfield & Williams, LLC, of Barnwell and Charles H. Williams, of Williams & Williams, of Orangeburg, for Respondents.

This appeal involves two questions. First, does the Department of Revenue's garnishment of Respondents' wages to collect delinquent medical debts on behalf of hospitals constitute a "tax" under section 12-60-80 of the South Carolina Code? Second, does subsection 12-60-80(C) prohibit any class action against the Department? The Court certified this appeal pursuant to Rule 204(b), SCACR.

Stephen J. Wukela, of Wukela Law Firm, of Florence, for Petitioner. G. Murrell Smith, Jr., of Lee, Erter, Wilson, Holler & Smith, L.L.C., of Sumter, for Respondents.

The Court granted a writ of certiorari to review the court of appeals' decision in Tedder v. Darlington Cty. Cmty. Action Agency, Op. No. 2018-UP-349 (S.C. Ct. App. filed Aug. 2018).

Chris Paton, of Chris Paton, LLC, of Mt. Pleasant and Courtney W. Kerce, of Payne Law Firm, of Daniel Island, for Petitioner. Gregory Samuel Forman, of Charleston, for Respondent.

We granted certiorari to review whether the court of appeals erred in affirming the trial court's decision to award attorney's fees when that award approaches a party's annual income.

James Blanding Holman IV, of Southern Environmental Law Center, of Charleston, Richard L. Whitt, of Whitt Law Firm, LLC, of Irmo, Benjamin L. Snowden and Joseph Samuel Dowdy, both of Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, of Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellants. K. Chad Burgess and Matthew Gissendanner, both of Cayce, Mitchell Willoughby, John M. S. Hoefer and Chad N. Johnston, all of Willoughby & Hoefer, P.A., of Columbia, Alexander George Shissias, of Columbia, Andrew McClendon Bateman and Jenny Rebecca Pittman, both of Columbia, for Respondents. Andrew McClendon Bateman and Jenny Rebecca Pittman, both of Columbia, for Amicus Curiae, South Carolina Office of Regulatory Staff.

In this direct appeal, Appellants appeal an order issued by the Public Service Commission regarding the annual review of the fuel purchasing practices and policies of Dominion Energy, f/k/a South Carolina Electric & Gas Company, pursuant to section 58-27-865 of the South Carolina Code (2015).

O. Grady Query, of Query Sautter & Associates, LLC and Dan M. David, both of Charleston; and Walter J. Kruger, III of Atlanta, GA, all for Plaintiff. Mark W. McKnight, of Charleston and W. Scott Turnbull of Crary Buchanan, P.A., of Stuart, FL, pro hac vice, for Defendants.

The United States District Court for the District of South Carolina has certified a question of law to this Court pursuant to Rule 244, SCACR. Specifically, the District Court asks this Court to determine whether the three-year statute of limitations of S.C. Code. § 15-3-530 applies to claims for promissory estoppel.