Note: Beginning in June 2012, opinions will be posted as Adobe PDFs. You can download a free copy of Adobe Reader here.
6-3-2003 - Opinions
2003-UP-376 - Heavener v. Walker
2003-UP-377 - Elliot Amusements v. Inlet Creek Properties
2003-UP-378 - State v. Heyward
2003-UP-381 - Dickey v. Holloway
2003-UP-382 - Gordon v. Michelin North America, Inc
6-4-2003 - Opinions
6-5-2003 - Opinions
2003-UP-384 - Reliford v. Aiken County Solicitor
2003-UP-385 - Young v. Montessori Elementary School
2003-UP-387 - Smart v. Gullick
2003-UP-388 - Richardson v. Faust
6-8-2003 - Opinions
6-10-2003 - Opinions
2003-UP-389 - Collins v. The Sintra Corporation
2003-UP-390 - Floral Beach Corporation v. Zoning Board of Surfside Beach
6-12-2003 - Opinions
2003-UP-391 - SC Department fo Transportation v. Phillips
2003-UP-394 - Windham v. McLeod Regional Medical Center
6-17-2003 - Opinions
2003-UP-396 - Coaxum v. Washington
2003-UP-397 - B B & T v. Chewning
2003-UP-398 - State v. Baldwin
2003-UP-402 - Coley v. Hamilton
2003-UP-403 - State v. Cameron
2003-UP-404 - Guess v. Benebict College et al.
6-18-2003 - Opinions
2003-UP-407 - State v. Johnson
2003-UP-409 - State v. Legette
2003-UP-410 - State v. Hallman
2003-UP-411 - Johnson v. Ahnert
2003-UP-412 - McCormick v. McCormick
6-19-2003 - Opinions
2003-UP-415 - Whiteplains Plantation Homeowners Association v. A Capital Auction and Real Estate Co
2003-UP-416 - Sloan v. SC Department of Transportation
2003-UP-417 - Seabrook Island Property Owners Association v. Berger
2003-UP-419 - State v. Spencer
6-24-2003 - Opinions
2003-UP-421 - State v. Baldwin
2003-UP-423 - China Inn of Columbia v. Yip
2003-UP-427 - State v. Burgess
2003-UP-428 - State v. Burgess
2003-UP-429 - State v. Armstrong
2003-UP-431 - Foster v. Foster
6-25-2003 - Opinions
2003-UP-434 - Landers v. Cloninger
2003-UP-435 - State v. Hightower
2003-UP-436 - State v. Lorenzen
2003-UP-437 - Jones v. Denmark Police Department
2003-UP-439 - Belton v. Jordan
6-26-2003 - Opinions
2003-UP-072 - Waye v. Three Rivers Apartments
2003-UP-443 - SC Department of Social Services v. Rose